1/29/2024 0 Comments Arp posion 4shadow![]() Similarly, it'sĮasy to shorten the page to truncate the message. However, an attacker could have easily added some marks to the paperĪnd completely changed the meaning of the message. Pen you can be fairly certain that no words have been removed by anĪttacker because pen marks are difficult to remove from paper. That we want to make sure that the data we receive is the same data The second primary goal is DATA INTEGRITY. ![]() The bathroom and turn on all the water to foil bugging, the property Obviously, if you have secrets, then you are probably concerned about WhenĪn adversary taps your phone, it poses a risk to your Usually, these listeners are simply eavesdroppers. When most people think of security, they think of CONFIDENTIALITY.Ĭonfidentiality means that your data is kept secret from unintended RFC 3552 Security Considerations Guidelines July 2003 2.1.1. Them into three major categories: CONFIDENTIALITY, DATA INTEGRITY and The partitioning we've found most useful is to divide Obviously interlock, but they can also be independently provided.ĭifferent authors partition the goals of communication securityĭifferently. Since communications are carried out by systemsĪnd access to systems is through communications channels, these goals Those relating to protecting systems (ADMINISTRATIVE SECURITY or We can loosely divide security goals into those related to protectingĬommunications (COMMUNICATION SECURITY, also known as COMSEC) and Properties are required for every application. Of related but somewhat independent properties. Property of a protocol or system, however, upon reflection, one Most people speak of security as if it were a single monolithic "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in thisĭocument are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", Second is a series of guidelines for writing Security Considerations The first is aĬombination security tutorial and definition of common terms the This document is structured in three parts. Provide guidance to RFC authors in service of both ends. The purpose of this is both to encourageĭocument authors to consider security in their designs and to inform IntroductionĪll RFCs are required by RFC 2223 to contain a SecurityĬonsiderations section. RFC 3552 Security Considerations Guidelines July 2003Īuthors' Addresses. 43 Rescorla & Korver Best Current Practice Writing Security Considerations Sections. Denial of Service Attacks and Countermeasures. Challenge Response and One Time Passwords. RFC 3552 Security Considerations Guidelines July 2003 3.3. 9 Rescorla & Korver Best Current Practice Provides guidelines to RFC authors on how to write a good Securityġ. Historically, such sections have been relatively weak. All Rights Reserved.Īll RFCs are required to have a Security Considerations section. ![]() Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Ĭopyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Guidelines for Writing RFC Text on Security Considerations RescorlaĬategory: Best Current Practice Xythos Software Updated by: 8996 Errata Exist Network Working Group E. RFC 3552: Guidelines for Writing RFC Text on Security Considerations
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |